Allahabad High Court
JIKARULLAHversusState of UP AND 3 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The petition was dismissed for non prosecution.
Summary
A criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 8633 of 2024) was filed by Jikarullah against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. The petition sought relief, but no counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner despite the names being listed. The learned Additional Government Advocate for the State was present. The Court observed that the petition was not being prosecuted and therefore dismissed it. Consequently, any interim order that had been granted was vacated.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition should proceed in the absence of any petitioner representation.
Subjects
- writ petition
- non prosecution
- dismissal
- interim order vacated
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8633 of 2024
Jikarullah
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of Up And 3 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Saroj Kumar Dubey, Vishwa Nath
Pandey
Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 49
HON'BLE AJAY BHANOT, J.
HON'BLE DIVESH CHANDRA SAMANT, J.
Matter is taken up in the revised call.
None appears on behalf of the petitioner to press the writ
petition. Names of counsel for the petitioner are shown in the
cause list. Learned AGA for the State is present.
The writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution.
Interim order if any stands vacated.
(Divesh Chandra Samant,J.) (Ajay Bhanot,J.)
September 23, 2026
Ashish Tripathi
Digitally signed by :-
ASHISH NAYAN TRIPATHI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…