Allahabad High Court
HARISHversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 2 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Summary
The petitioner, Harish, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 8634 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh and two others. The petitioner’s counsel, Gaurav Tripathi, was not present at the hearing. No interim order had been passed in the matter. The Court observed that the petition had become infructuous due to the passage of time. Consequently, the petition was dismissed as infructuous.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate disposition of a criminal miscellaneous writ petition that has become infructuous due to lapse of time?
Subjects
- petition dismissed
- infructuous
- limitation
- criminal miscellaneous writ
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8634 of 2025
Harish
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Gaurav Tripathi
Counsel for Respondent(s) : Babita Upadhyay, G.A.
Court No. - 44
HON'BLE SIDDHARTH, J.
HON'BLE VINAI KUMAR DWIVEDI, J.
1. Case is called out.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner is not present.
3. There was no interim order passed in this case.
4. The petition appears to have become infructuous by efflux of time, it, is
accordingly dismissed as infructuous.
(Vinai Kumar Dwivedi,J.) (Siddharth,J.)
May 8, 2026
Aditya
Digitally signed by :-
ADITYA KUSHWAHA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…