Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SMT REETA DEVIversusState of UP AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution.

Summary

Smt. Reeta Devi filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 8988 of 2024 before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State and three others. The petition was listed for hearing and counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Raju Kanaujia, was noted in the cause list. However, no representative appeared on behalf of the petitioner to prosecute the petition. Consequently, the Court dismissed the writ petition on the ground of non‑prosecution and vacated any interim order that had been in force. The judgment was delivered by Hon'ble Judges Ajay Bhanot and Divesh Chandra Samant on 23 September 2026.

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • non prosecution
  • dismissal
  • Allahabad High Court

Judgment

                                               HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8988 of 2024

                                    Smt Reeta Devi
                                                                                           .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                    Versus

                                    State Of Up And 3 Others
                                                                                         .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                   :   Raju Kanaujia
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                   :   G.A.

                                    Court No. - 49
                                                     HON'BLE AJAY BHANOT, J.
                                                     HON'BLE DIVESH CHANDRA SAMANT, J.

                                    Matter is taken up in the revised call. Name of counsel for the
                                    petitioner is shown in the cause list. None appears on behalf of
                                    the petitioner to press the writ petition. Learned AGA for the
                                    State is present.

                                    The writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution.

                                    Interim order if any stands vacated.


                                                             (Divesh Chandra Samant,J.) (Ajay Bhanot,J.)
                                    September 23, 2026
                                    Virendra




Digitally signed by :-
VIRENDRA KUMAR BHARTEEY
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.