Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

RAMU @ RAMNATH AND 8 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Decided

Holding

The revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioners, Ramu @ Ramnath and eight others, filed a criminal revision challenging an order dated 10 November 2025 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kairana, which rejected the Final Report No.87 of 2018 and allowed a protest petition filed by the State. The underlying case involved offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 323, 326 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioners sought to set aside the magistrate's order but did not pursue the prayer for an alternative remedy as required by law. The High Court observed that the petitioners had effectively withdrawn their relief. Consequently, the Court dismissed the revision petition as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether the order of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate rejecting the final report and allowing the protest petition can be set aside by a criminal revision

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • criminal revision
  • IPC sections
  • final report rejection
  • protest petition
  • withdrawal of petition
  • appellate procedure

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                      CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 364 of 2026

                                    Ramu @ Ramnath And 8 Others
                                                                                             .....Revisionist(s)
                                                                      Versus

                                    State of U.P. and Another
                                                                                                  .....Opposite
                                                                                                        Party(s)

                                    Counsel for Revisionist(s)    : Ashish Kumar, Kuldeep Kumar Gupta
                                    Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.

                                    Court No. - 85
                                                         HON'BLE MANOJ BAJAJ, J.

                                    Petitioners are aggrieved against the order dated 10.11.2025 passed by
                                    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kairana, Shamli in Case
                                    No.73/2012 of 2023, titled Bijendra vs. Ramu @ Ramnath and others,
                                    arising out of case crime no.1011 of 2017, under Sections 147, 148, 149,
                                    307, 323, 326, 506 IPC, registered at Police Station Kairana, District
                                    Shamli, whereby trial court has rejected the Final Report No.87 of 2018,
                                    dated 2.5.2018 and allowed the protest petition filed by the opposite party
                                    no.2.

                                    Learned counsel for the petitioners does not press the prayer made in this
                                    revision petition in order to avail the alternative remedy in accordance
                                    with law.

                                    Dismissed as withdrawn.



                                                                                             (Manoj Bajaj,J.)
                                    May 7, 2026
                                    Raj




Digitally signed by :-
RAJ KUMAR
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.