Allahabad High Court
RAJVEER MADANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
- Decided
- Bench
- MANOJ BAJAJ
Holding
The revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary
The petitioner, Rajeev Madan, filed a revision petition under Section 127(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code challenging an order dated 04.08.2022 passed by the Additional Principal Judge of the Family Court, Saharanpur, which had dismissed his application 3‑A. The revision sought to set aside the dismissal of his application. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel chose not to press the matter further and requested that the petition be withdrawn. The High Court noted the withdrawal request and dismissed the revision petition accordingly. No merits of the original application were examined, and the petition was closed as withdrawn.
Subjects
- Criminal Procedure Code
- Section 127
- Revision
- Family Court
- Withdrawal of petition
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 4009 of 2022
Rajeev Madan
.....Revisionist(s)
Versus
State of U.P. and Another
.....Opposite
Party(s)
Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Anurag Pathak, Harshit Pathak
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Mohd. Ashraf
Court No. - 85
HON'BLE MANOJ BAJAJ, J.
Petitioner has filed this revision petition to challenge the impugned order
dated 04.08.2022 passed by Additional Principal Judge, Family Court,
Saharanpur, titled Rajeev Madan Vs. Smt. Achala, in case No.267 of
2016, under Section 127(2) Cr.P.C., whereby application 3-A, under
Section 127(2) filed by the petitioner was dismissed.
After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner does not
press the revision petition and prays for withdrawal.
The revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Manoj Bajaj,J.)
April 28, 2026
R./
Digitally signed by :-
RAJEEV KUMAR SACHDEVA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…