Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

CHANKIT KHOSLAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Decided

Holding

The criminal revision is dismissed as not pressed.

Summary

Chankit Khosla filed Criminal Revision No. 5435 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the revisionist’s counsel, Dhiraj Kumar Pandey, informed the Court that the revisionist no longer wished to pursue the revision and prayed for its dismissal as not pressed. The State’s A.G.A. and the counsel for the second opposite party, Saurabh Kumar, raised no objection to this request. The Court examined the submission and, finding no opposition, dismissed the criminal revision on the ground that it was not pressed. The order was pronounced by Hon’ble Justice Prashant Mishra‑I on 20 April 2026.

Issues considered

  • Whether a criminal revision may be dismissed on the ground that it is not pressed by the revisionist?

Subjects

  • criminal revision
  • dismissal
  • not pressed
  • procedural law
  • high court

Judgment

                                              HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                     CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 5435 of 2025

                                    Chankit Khosla
                                                                                            .....Revisionist(s)
                                                                     Versus

                                    State of U.P. and Another
                                                                                                 .....Opposite
                                                                                                       Party(s)

                                    Counsel for Revisionist(s)                :   Dhiraj Kumar Pandey
                                    Counsel for Opposite Party(s)             :   G.A., Saurabh Kumar

                                    Court No. - 88
                                                     HON'BLE PRASHANT MISHRA-I, J.

                                    Mr. Dheeraj Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the revisionist, learned
                                    A.G.A. representing the State and Mr. Saurabh Kumar, learned counsel
                                    for opposite party No. 2 are present.

                                    Learned counsel for the revisionist submits that the revisionist does not
                                    want to press this criminal revision, therefore, the same maybe dismissed
                                    as not pressed.

                                    Learned A.G.A. representing the State and Mr. Saurabh Kumar, learned
                                    counsel for opposite party No. 2 have no objection to such prayer made
                                    on behalf of the revisionist.

                                    In view of the above, the instant criminal revision is dismissed as not
                                    pressed.



                                                                                       (Prashant Mishra-I,J.)
                                    April 20, 2026
                                    Kashifa




Digitally signed by :-
KASHIFA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.