Allahabad High Court
MANGEY RAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
- Decided
- Bench
- MANOJ BAJAJ
Holding
The revision petition is dismissed as infructuous because the petitioner is no longer able to pursue the relief.
Summary
Mangey Ram filed a revision petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge (Special Judge, SC/ST Act) which upheld his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, and affirmed a sentence of one year imprisonment with a compensation of Rs.9,50,000. The petition sought to set aside the conviction and sentence imposed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hapur. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner informed the court that the petitioner was no longer alive, rendering the petition infructuous. The court held that a revision cannot proceed when the petitioner is deceased or otherwise unable to pursue the relief. Consequently, the revision petition was dismissed as infructuous.
Issues considered
- Whether a revision petition remains maintainable when the petitioner is no longer alive or able to pursue the relief.
- Whether the earlier conviction and sentence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act can be set aside in such circumstances.
Legislation cited
- Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — s. 138
Subjects
- revision
- criminal procedure
- Section 138
- Negotiable Instruments Act
- compensation
- infructuous petition
- conviction upheld
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 665 of 2021
Mangey Ram
.....Revisionist(s)
Versus
State of U.P. and Another
.....Opposite
Party(s)
Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Ravindra Pratap Singh
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 85
HON'BLE MANOJ BAJAJ, J.
Petitioner has filed this revision petition to challenge the impugned
judgment dated 29.01.2021 passed by Additional Sessions Judge/Special
Judge (SC/ST Act), Hapur in Criminal Appeal No.33 of 2020, titled
Mangey Ram Vs. State of U.P. and another, whereby the judgment of
conviction and order of sentence dated 02.11.2020 passed by Chief
Judicial Magistrate, Hapur, in Complaint Case No.1379 of 2013,
convicting the petitioner under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act,
1881, has been upheld. The sentence of one year simple imprisonment
alongwith compensation of Rs.9,50,000/- imposed upon the accused-
petitioner by the trial court has also been affirmed.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petition has become
infructuous as the revisionist is no more.
In view of the above, the revision petition is dismissed as infructuous.
(Manoj Bajaj,J.)
April 22, 2026
R./
Digitally signed by :-
RAJEEV KUMAR SACHDEVA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…