Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

X-JUVENILEversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

The revision petition filed by a juvenile (the revisionist) sought relief in a criminal matter before the High Court of Allahabad. The revisionist, through counsel Gulafsha, requested that the revision be withdrawn because the juvenile had already confessed before the Juvenile Justice Board, Khuldabad, Prayagraj. The State of U.P. and the other respondents, represented by G.A. and Surendra Kumar Yadav, along with the Additional Government Advocate, raised no objection to the withdrawal. The Court considered whether a revision could be dismissed on the ground of voluntary withdrawal after a confession. Finding no impediment, the Court dismissed the revision as withdrawn. The order was pronounced by Justice Prashant Mishra‑I on 12 May 2026.

Issues considered

  • Whether a criminal revision petition can be withdrawn by the petitioner after the petitioner has confessed before the Juvenile Justice Board

Subjects

  • revision
  • juvenile justice
  • withdrawal of petition
  • confession
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                                              HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                     CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 696 of 2026

                                    X-Juvenile
                                                                                            .....Revisionist(s)
                                                                     Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                                 .....Opposite
                                                                                                       Party(s)

                                    Counsel for Revisionist(s)         :   Gulafsha, Omar Zamin
                                    Counsel for Opposite Party(s)      :   G.A., Surendra Kumar Yadav

                                    Court No. - 84
                                                     HON'BLE PRASHANT MISHRA-I, J.

                                    1. Ms. Gulafsha, learned counsel for the revisionist, Mr. Surendra Kumar
                                    Yadav, learned counsel for Opposite Party No. 2 and learned A.G.A. for
                                    the State are present.

                                    2. Learned counsel for the revisionist submits that she wants to withdraw
                                    the instant revision as the revisionist has confessed before the Juvenile
                                    Justice Board, Khuldabad, Prayagraj.

                                    3. Learned counsel A.G.A. as well as learned counsel for Opposite Party
                                    No. 2 have no objection to the aforesaid prayer.

                                    4. Taking note of the aforesaid submissions, the instant revision is
                                    dismissed as withdrawn.



                                                                                      (Prashant Mishra-I,J.)
                                    May 12, 2026
                                    Saurabh




Digitally signed by :-
SAURABH
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.