Allahabad High Court
ARUN BHARDWAJversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
- Decided
- Bench
- PRASHANT MISHRA I
Holding
The criminal revision was dismissed as not pressed.
Summary
Arun Bhardwaj filed a criminal revision before the Allahabad High Court challenging a prior order. During the hearing, counsel for the revisionist informed the court that the revisionist no longer wished to pursue the matter. The State's Additional Government Advocate (A.G.A.) did not oppose this request. The court, taking note of the revisionist's statement, dismissed the criminal revision on the ground that it was not pressed. No substantive merits of the original dispute were examined, and the matter was closed procedurally.
Issues considered
- Whether a criminal revision may be dismissed on the ground that the revisionist does not wish to press the revision
Subjects
- criminal revision
- not pressed
- procedural dismissal
- high court
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 8337 of 2025
Arun Bhardwaj
.....Revisionist(s)
Versus
State of U.P. and Another
.....Opposite
Party(s)
Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Rakesh Kumar Gupta
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Hemant Kumar, Piyush Pandey
Court No. - 88
HON'BLE PRASHANT MISHRA-I, J.
Heard Mr. Rakesh Kumar Gupta, learned counsel for the revisionist
and learned A.G.A. representing the State.
Learned counsel for the revisionist submits that the revisionist does
not want to press this criminal revision, therefore, the same may be
dismissed as not pressed.
Learned A.G.A. has no objection to such prayer made by learned
counsel for the revisionist.
In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the revisionist
at the Bar, the instant criminal revision is dismissed as not pressed.
(Prashant Mishra-I,J.)
March 24, 2026
Kashifa
Digitally signed by :-
KASHIFA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…