Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

BRIJESH KUMAR YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The revision is dismissed and withdrawn.

Summary

In a criminal revision before the Allahabad High Court, the appellant Brijesh Kumar Yadav, through counsel Upendra Kumar Tiwari, sought to withdraw the revision on the ground of changed circumstances. No counsel appeared for the second opposite party. The State of Uttar Pradesh and its counsel were present. The court considered the appellant's request to dismiss the revision. Finding no objection, the court ordered that the revision be dismissed and withdrawn.

Subjects

  • criminal revision
  • withdrawal of revision
  • procedural law

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

                                                     CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 8888 of 2025

                                    Brijesh Kumar Yadav
                                                                                                .....Revisionist(s)
                                                                       Versus
                                    State Of U.P. And 2 Others
                                                                                                     .....Opposite
                                                                                                           Party(s)

                                    Counsel for Revisionist(s)    : Upendra Kumar Tiwari
                                    Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Anand Kumar, G.A., Vinod Kumar
                                                                    Yadav

                                    Court No. - 88
                                                        HON'BLE ACHAL SACHDEV, J.

                                    1. Sri Upendra Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the for revisionist and
                                    learned AGA for the State are present.

                                    2. None appears on behalf of the opposite party no.2, even in the revised
                                    call.

                                    3. Learned counsel for the revisionist submits that due to change
                                    circumstances he does not wish to press this revision and prays that same
                                    may be dismissed a withdrawn.

                                    4. In view of the above, present revision is dismissed a withdrawn.

                                    May 18, 2026
                                    VKG
                                                                                             (Achal Sachdev,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
VIJAY KUMAR GUPTA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.