Allahabad High Court
RAM PRASADversusBECHAN LAL and ANR.
- Decided
- Disposal
- Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)
- Bench
- PRASHANT KUMAR
Holding
The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
Ram Prasad filed a first appeal against order No. 316 of 2017 passed by the lower court. The appellant's counsel, Udai Bahn Pandey, did not appear before the High Court and no request for adjournment was made. The respondents, Bechan Lal and another, were represented by Shobh Nath Pandey. The court observed that the appeal was not prosecuted and therefore could not be entertained. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution and any interim order that may have existed was vacated.
Issues considered
- Whether the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution due to non‑appearance of the appellant’s counsel
Subjects
- appeal dismissed
- want of prosecution
- non‑appearance
- interim order vacated
Judgment
Court No. - 6
Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER No. - 316 of 2017
Appellant :- Ram Prasad
Respondent :- Bechan Lal And Anr.
Counsel for Appellant :- Udai Bahn Pandey
Counsel for Respondent :- Shobh Nath Pandey
Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J.
List is being revised.
None is present on behalf of the appellant to press this appeal
nor there is any request to adjourn or pass over the case.
The appeal is of the year 2011.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
The order has been passed in presence of Shri Shobh Nath
Pandey, learned counsel for the respondents.
...................................................................(Rajnish Kumar, J.)
Order Date :- 15.10.2024
Haseen U.
Digitally signed by :-
HASEENUDDIN
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad,
Lucknow Bench
Checking your session…