Allahabad High Court
MRS. UMA RAWAT @ MRS. UMA PREM CHANDRA RAWAT AND 2 OTHERSversusMRS. KANHAIYA LAL RAWAT AND 2 OTHERS
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed off/Decided on merits
- Bench
- PRASHANT KUMAR
Holding
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
The matter was a first appeal filed by Mrs. Uma Rawat and two others against an order dated 2024. The respondents were Mrs. Kanhaiya Lal Rawat and two others. Counsel for the appellant was Ms. Gayatri Singh and for the respondents were Dr. Shipra Tripathi, C.S.C., and Harshvardhan. No representative appeared on behalf of the appellants and no request for adjournment or further hearing was made. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution and vacated any interim order that might have been in force.
Issues considered
- Can an appeal proceed when the appellant fails to appear or prosecute the case?
Subjects
- appeal dismissed
- procedural default
- vacated interim order
- high court procedure
Judgment
Court No. - 4
Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER No. - 343 of 2024
Appellant :- Mrs. Uma Rawat @ Mrs. Uma Prem Chandra Rawat And 2
Others
Respondent :- Mrs. Kanhaiya Lal Rawat And 2 Others
Counsel for Appellant :- Gayatri Singh
Counsel for Respondent :- Dr. Shipra Tripathi,C.S.C.,Harshvardhan
Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J.
1. Case called out in the revised list.
2. No one appeared on behalf of the appellants to press this
appeal nor there is any request to adjourn or pass over the case.
3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
4. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 6.1.2025
Raj
Digitally signed by :-
RAJ NIGAM
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad,
Lucknow Bench
Checking your session…