Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SMT. LAXMI DEVIversusPERSON and PROPERTY OF SRI ANANT RAGHUNATH S. BUDDHEY and ORS.

Decided
Disposal
Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

Holding

The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

The appellant, Smt. Laxmi Devi, filed a first appeal before the Allahabad High Court against an order dated 2018. The respondents were the person and property of Sri Anant Raghunath S. Buddhey and others. No counsel or party appeared on behalf of the appellant to argue the appeal, and no request for adjournment was made. The court noted the absence of prosecution and, under procedural rules, dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution. The judgment was delivered by Justice Prashant Kumar on 5 January 2026.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate procedural consequence when an appellant fails to appear or prosecute an appeal before the High Court?

Subjects

  • appeal dismissed
  • want of prosecution
  • procedural law
  • civil procedure
  • high court

Judgment

                                                 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                                LUCKNOW
                                                     FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER No. - 423 of 2018

                                     Smt. Laxmi Devi
                                                                                              .....Appellant(s)
                                                                        Versus

                                     Person And Property Of Sri Anant Raghunath S.
                                     Buddhey And Ors.                                       .....Respondent(s)

                                     Counsel for Appellant(s)        : Sadhu    Saran   Shukla,        Sikandar
                                                                       Zulqarnain Khan
                                     Counsel for Respondent(s)       : Madhu Srivastava

                                    Court No. - 20
                                                        HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J.

                                    1. Case called out in the revised call.

                                    2. No one appeared on behalf of the appellant(s) to press this appeal nor
                                    there is any request to adjourn or pass over the case.

                                    3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.



                                                                                        (Prashant Kumar,J.)
                                    January 5, 2026
                                    Anupam S/-




Digitally signed by :-
ANUPAM SINGH PATEL
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad,
Lucknow Bench


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.