Allahabad High Court
RISHI KUMAR TRIPATHI AND OTHERSversusINDRAJEET PANDEY AND OTHERS
- Decided
- Disposal
- Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits/Granted
Holding
The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
The appellant Rishi Kumar Tripathi and others filed a first appeal against Order No. 70 of 2018. The appeal was listed for hearing, but a pass‑over slip was issued and the matter was transferred to the first round of hearing. When the revised list was prepared, none of the appellants appeared, although counsel for the respondents, G.M. Kamil, was present. The court observed that the appeal had not been prosecuted. Consequently, the court dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution and vacated any interim order that might have been in force. The order was pronounced on 16 January 2025 by Justice Rajnish Kumar, J., of the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate consequence when an appeal is not prosecuted?
Subjects
- appeal
- want of prosecution
- order dismissal
- high court
Judgment
Court No. - 4
Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER No. - 70 of 2018
Appellant :- Rishi Kumar Tripathi And Others
Respondent :- Indrajeet Pandey And Others
Counsel for Appellant :- Sachindra Dwivedi
Counsel for Respondent :- Ashok Mehrotra,Ghulam Mohammad Kamil
Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J.
In this case pass over slip was sent, therefore, the matter was
passed over in the first round, however none is present in the
revised list, whereas Shri G.M.Kamil, learned counsel for the
respondents is present. The appeal is of the year 2018.
The First Appeal From Order is dismissed for want of
prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
.
.......................................(Rajnish Kumar,J.)
Order Date :- 16.1.2025
Banswar
Digitally signed by :-
RAM NARESH BANSWAR
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad,
Lucknow Bench
Checking your session…