Allahabad High Court
SATYENDRA SINGHversusRAKAMVEER SINGH AND 2 OTHERS
- Decided
- Bench
- PIYUSH AGRAWAL
Holding
The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
The appellant, Satyendra Singh, filed a first appeal against the order dated 1246 of 2015. No counsel or party appeared on behalf of the appellant during the hearing. The court dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution, finding that the appellant had failed to pursue the matter. Consequently, any interim order that had been in force was vacated. The order was pronounced in the presence of the respondent's counsel, Bibhuti Narayan Singh.
Issues considered
- Whether the appeal can proceed in the absence of the appellant and his counsel
- Whether dismissal for want of prosecution is appropriate under procedural law
Subjects
- appeal
- want of prosecution
- vacated interim order
- civil procedure
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER DEFECTIVE No. - 1246 of 2015
Satyendra Singh
.....Appellant(s)
Versus
Rakamveer Singh And 2 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Appellant(s) : Kuldeep Kumar, Pushpendra Singh,
Santosh Kumar Rai
Counsel for Respondent(s) : , Bibhuti Narayan Singh, Mohan
Srivastava
Court No. - 7
HON'BLE PIYUSH AGRAWAL, J.
1. List is revised.
2. Nobody is present on behalf of the appellant.
3. The case is dismissed for want of prosecution.
4. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
5. This order has been passed in the presence of Sri Bibhuti Narayan
Singh, learned counsel for respondent.
(Piyush Agrawal,J.)
March 19, 2026
Abhishek Gupta
Digitally signed by :-
ABHISHEK GUPTA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…