Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SMT. RAJKUMARI AND 4 OTHERSversusCHIEF MANAGER, U.P.S.R.T.C. AND ANOTHER

Decided

Holding

The appeal is dismissed for non‑compliance with Chapter XII Rule 4 of the Allahabad High Court Rules.

Summary

The appellants, Smt. Rajkumari and four others, filed a first appeal against the Chief Manager of U.P.S.R.T.C. and another respondent. The appeal was listed under Chapter XII Rule 4 of the Allahabad High Court Rules, which mandates the appellant to supply requisites for service on the respondent. The court’s office report indicated that the appellant’s counsel failed to provide the required requisites for service. Consequently, the court found that the procedural requirement under the Rules had not been complied with. Relying on Chapter XII Rule 4, the court dismissed the appeal. The judgment was delivered by Hon'ble Justice Anil Kumar‑X on 11 September 2026.

Issues considered

  • Whether the appellant complied with the requirement to supply requisites for service on the respondent under Chapter XII Rule 4 of the Allahabad High Court Rules?

Subjects

  • procedural law
  • service of notice
  • Allahabad High Court Rules
  • appeal dismissal

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                           FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER DEFECTIVE No. - 248 of 2018

                                    Smt. Rajkumari And 4 Others
                                                                                               .....Appellant(s)
                                                                      Versus

                                    Chief Manager, U.P.S.R.T.C. And Another
                                                                                             .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Appellant(s)       : Jitendra Singh, Kishore Gaurav
                                                                     Kulshrestha, Parvesh Singh, Pranav
                                                                     Tiwary, Rishab Agrawal, Sharad
                                                                     Sharma, Utkarsh Tripathi
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)      :


                                    Court No. - 54
                                                        HON'BLE ANIL KUMAR-X, J.

                                    1. The matter is listed under Chapter XII Rule 4 of the Allahabad High
                                    Court Rules.

                                    2. As per office report, in compliance of the order of this Court, no steps
                                    have been taken by the learned counsel for the appellant for supplying
                                    requisites in the office for service on the respondent.

                                    3. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed under Chapter XII Rule 4 of the
                                    Allahabad High Court Rules.


                                                                                           (Anil Kumar-X,J.)
                                    September 11, 2026
                                    SK




Digitally signed by :-
SUSHEEL KUMAR
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.