Allahabad High Court
ALOK AKHILAversusSURAJ LAL YADAV
- Decided
- Disposal
- Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits/Granted
- Bench
- PRASHANT KUMAR
Holding
The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution due to the appellant's failure to appear.
Summary
The appellant Alok Akhila filed a first appeal (No. 51 of 2021) against the respondent Suraj Lal Yadav. The appeal was listed before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, but the appellant failed to appear and made no request for adjournment or to press the appeal. The court noted the absence of the appellant and the lack of any request to continue the proceedings. Consequently, the court dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution. The interim order, if any, was vacated.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate course of action when an appellant fails to appear for a scheduled hearing and makes no request for adjournment?
Subjects
- appeal
- want of prosecution
- procedural dismissal
- court order
- interim order vacated
Judgment
Court No. - 6
Case :- FIRST APPEAL No. - 51 of 2021
Appellant :- Alok Akhila
Respondent :- Suraj Lal Yadav
Counsel for Appellant :- Brijesh Kumar,Ravi Shanker
Tewari,Utkarsh Srivastava
Counsel for Respondent :- Mohd Hidayat Vllah
Ansari,Shashendra Pratap Singh
Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J.
List is being revised.
None is present for the appellant to press this appeal nor there is
any request to adjourn or pass over the case.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
...................................................................(Rajnish Kumar, J.)
Order Date :- 2.8.2024
Haseen U.
Digitally signed by :-
HASEENUDDIN
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad,
Lucknow Bench
Checking your session…