Allahabad High Court
JAMEEL ANSARI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
- Decided
- Bench
- SANJAY KUMAR PACHORI
Holding
The application is dismissed for want of prosecution due to the petitioners' failure to appear.
Summary
The petitioners, Jameel Ansari and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the Allahabad High Court. Their counsel was Abdul Saleem Ahamad, while the State was represented by G.A. The petitioners failed to appear even after a revised call. The learned Additional Government Advocate for the State was present. The Court, noting the absence of the petitioners, dismissed the application for want of prosecution. The order was pronounced by Justice Sanjay Kumar Pachori on September 8, 2026.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate course of action when an applicant fails to appear for a hearing of an application under Section 528 CrPC?
Legislation cited
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 528
Subjects
- Criminal Procedure Code
- Section 528
- application dismissal
- want of prosecution
- High Court
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 29359 of 2026
Jameel Ansari And Another
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State of U.P. and Another
.....Opposite
Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Abdul Saleem Ahamad
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 77
HON'BLE SANJAY KUMAR PACHORI, J.
None appears for the applicants even in the revised call, however, learned
A.G.A. for the State is present.
In view of above, present application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
September 8, 2026
T. Sinha
(Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.)
Digitally signed by :-
TRIPTI SINHA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…