Allahabad High Court
AKASHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
- Decided
- Bench
- SANJAY KUMAR PACHORI
Holding
The court did not decide on the merits and merely adjourned the application, directing a fresh hearing.
Summary
An application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure was filed by Akash against the State of U.P. and three others. The applicant's counsel, Satya Prakash Singh, was present but the applicant himself was not. The opposing counsel, G.A., appeared before the court. The bench, noting the absence of the applicant, adjourned the matter and ordered that it be listed as a fresh case on 14 May 2026. No substantive merits were addressed, and the matter was scheduled for further hearing.
Issues considered
- Whether the application under Section 528 can proceed in the absence of the applicant
Legislation cited
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 528
Subjects
- Criminal Procedure Code
- Section 528
- Application
- Adjournment
- Non-appearance
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 3982 of 2026
Akash
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
.....Opposite
Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Satya Prakash Singh
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 76
HON'BLE SANJAY KUMAR PACHORI, J.
List of cases has been revised. None is present on behalf of the applicant to
press this application.
However, learned A.G.A. is present.
In the interest of justice, put up this case as fresh on 14.05.2026.
April 20, 2026
Ishan
(Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.)
Digitally signed by :-
ISHAN JAISWAL
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…