Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

ANIRUDDH ALIAS RAJA ALIAS MAMAversusSTATE OF U.P.

Decided

Holding

The court held that the applicant should be released in all seven cases on a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000 and two sureties of equal amount, given his inability to furnish sureties and the circumstances of his detention.

Summary

The applicant, Aniruddh Alias Raja Alias Mama, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking release in seven pending criminal cases on the basis of a personal bond and two sureties. He argued that he is a poor person unable to furnish the required sureties and that his arrest in an Arms Act case was based on an irrelevant confessional statement. The court noted that bail had been granted in all the cases but the applicant remained incarcerated since 18‑09‑2025. Considering his financial incapacity, the court directed that he be released in all seven cases upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000 and two sureties of the same amount. The application was disposed of finally with the said directions.

Issues considered

  • Whether the applicant can be released on personal bond and two sureties under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. despite multiple pending cases
  • Whether the confessional statement in the Arms Act case is relevant to the other charges

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • personal bond
  • sureties
  • Section 528
  • multiple criminal cases
  • poor accused
  • release from custody
  • Arms Act
  • confessional statement

Judgment

         HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

            APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 9466 of 2026

Aniruddh Alias Raja Alias Mama
                                                             .....Applicant(s)
                                   Versus
State of U.P.
                                                                .....Opposite
                                                                      Party(s)

Counsel for Applicant(s)                          :    Sushil Kumar
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)                     :    G.A.

Court No. - 74
                HON'BLE SANJAY KUMAR PACHORI, J.

Heard Sri Sushil Kumar Rathore, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri
Madhvendra Pratap Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State.

The present application under Section 528 of B.N.S.S. has been filed to issue
a direction to release the applicant in 7 cases on the basis of personal bond
and two sureties, which are as follows:

(i) Case Crime No. 114 of 2025, under Sections 305(a), 331(4), 317(2) of
B.N.S., P.S. Gohan, District Jalaun.

(ii) Case Crime No. 117 of 2025, under Sections 305(a), 331(4), 317(2) of
B.N.S., P.S. Kuthaund, District Jalaun.

(iii) Case Crime No. 116 of 2025, under Sections 305(a), 331(4), 317(2) of
B.N.S., P.S. Gohan, District Jalaun.

(iv) Case Crime No. 237 of 2025, under Sections 305(a), 331(4), 317(2) of
B.N.S., P.S. Kotwali Jalaun, District Jalaun.

(v) Case Crime No. 243 of 2025, under Sections 305(a), 317(2) of B.N.S.,
P.S. Kotwali Jalaun, District Jalaun.

(vi) Case Crime No. 161 of 2025, under Section 3/25 of Arms Act, P.S.
Kuthaund, District Jalaun.

(vii) Case Crime No. 100 of 2025, under Sections 305), 317(2) of B.N.S.,
P.S. Gohan, District Jalaun.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that in all the cases the applicant
has been granted bail. Applicant is a poor person and is unable to furnish
                                                                                              NA528 No. 9466 of 2026
                                                                     2

                                    sureties in all the cases. It is further submitted that applicant has been
                                    implicated in all the cases after arresting in a case related to Section 3/25 of
                                    Arms Act on the basis of confessional statement, which is irrelevant. The
                                    applicant is languishing in jail since 18.9.2025 and his last bail application
                                    has been allowed on 16.2.2026.

                                    In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, the court concerned is
                                    directed to release the applicant in all the 7 cases after furnishing personal
                                    bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- and two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of
                                    the court concerned, in the aforesaid cases.

                                    With the aforesaid directions, the application stands disposed of finally.

                                    March 18, 2026
                                    T. Sinha
                                                                                     (Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
TRIPTI SINHA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.