Allahabad High Court
RAJENDRA KUMAR JAISWALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
- Decided
- Bench
- SANJAY KUMAR PACHORI
Holding
The application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
The applicant, Rajendra Kumar Jaiswal, filed an application under Section 529 of the Code of Civil Procedure before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant at the initial hearing or at the revised call, and the applicant himself was absent on the subsequent date. The State, represented by learned A.G.A. Kamleshwar Singh, was present. The Court observed that the applicant failed to prosecute the application. Consequently, the Court dismissed the application for want of prosecution. The order was pronounced on 18 September 2026 by Justice Sanjay Kumar Pachori.
Issues considered
- Whether an application under Section 529 CPC can be dismissed for want of prosecution when the applicant fails to appear or present counsel.
Legislation cited
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 529
Subjects
- Civil Procedure
- Section 529
- Dismissal
- Want of prosecution
- High Court
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 611 of 2025
Rajendra Kumar Jaiswal
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
.....Opposite
Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ashraf Ali
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 77
HON'BLE SANJAY KUMAR PACHORI, J.
None appears for the applicant even in the revised call, however, Shri
Kamleshwar Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State are present.
On 2.6.2026, none was present on behalf of the applicant.
In view of above, present application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
September 18, 2026
T. Sinha
(Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.)
Digitally signed by :-
TRIPTI SINHA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…