Allahabad High Court
SHABANA PARVEENversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
- Decided
- Bench
- RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA
Holding
The court ordered that the applicant must apply for regular bail within four weeks and that no coercive action be taken against her during that period, thereby disposing of the anticipatory bail application.
Summary
The applicant, Shabana Parveen, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The counsel requested that the applicant be allowed to approach the concerned court for regular bail and that his interests be protected in the interim. The opposing counsel raised no objection. The High Court directed that the applicant must appear before the concerned court within four weeks and apply for regular bail in the specified case, and that her bail application be considered expeditiously without being influenced by any prior rejection of the anticipatory bail. The court also ordered that no coercive action be taken against the applicant for a period of four weeks. The anticipatory bail application was consequently disposed of with these directions.
Issues considered
- Whether the anticipatory bail application under Section 482 CrPC can be stayed pending the filing of a regular bail application
- Whether the court can prohibit coercive action against the applicant during the interim period
Legislation cited
- B.N.S. — s. 115(2), 191(2), 310(2), 317(3), 324(4), 333, 351(3), 352, 61(2)
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- regular bail
- Section 482 CrPC
- coercive action
- High Court
- criminal procedure
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No.
- 10292 of 2026
Shabana Parveen
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State of U.P. and Another
.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rakesh Pati Tiwari
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 71
HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J.
1. After some arguments, Learned counsel for the applicant prays that he
may be permitted to approach the concerned Court for seeking regular
bail. He further prays that for a short time, the interest of the applicant
may be protected.
2. The Learned AGA has no objection to the said prayer.
3. Taking into account the submissions made by the Learned counsel for
the parties, it is directed that in case the applicant appears before the
Court concerned within a period of four weeks from today and applies for
bail in Case Crime No.292 of 2026, under Sections 61(2), 191(2), 333,
324(4), 115(2), 352, 351(3), 310(2), 317 (3) B.N.S., Police Station Prem
Nagar, District Bareilly, his application for bail shall be considered and
disposed of expeditiously, in accordance with the law, without being
influenced by any observations made by the concerned Court while
rejecting the anticipatory bail application of the applicant.
4. For a period of four weeks from today, no coercive action shall be
taken against the applicant in the aforesaid case.
5. With the aforesaid observations/directions, this application stands
disposed of.
(Rajiv Lochan Shukla,J.)
October 1, 2026
A. Pandey
Digitally signed by :-
ANAND PANDEY
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…