Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

VIJAY SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Decided

Holding

The court ordered that the applicant may apply for regular bail within four weeks and that no coercive action be taken against him during that period, thereby disposing of the anticipatory bail application.

Summary

The applicant, Vijay Sharma, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Both parties' counsel agreed to allow the applicant to seek regular bail. The court directed that the applicant must appear before the concerned court within four weeks to apply for bail in the pending criminal case and that his bail application be considered expeditiously, without being influenced by any prior rejection of the anticipatory bail. The court also ordered that no coercive action be taken against the applicant for the four‑week period. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application was disposed with these directions.

Issues considered

  • Whether the applicant can be permitted to apply for regular bail after filing an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 CrPC
  • Whether a stay on coercive action can be ordered pending the regular bail application

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • regular bail
  • Section 482
  • coercive action
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                                                 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                        CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No.
                                                                - 10293 of 2026

                                    Vijay Sharma
                                                                                                    .....Applicant(s)
                                                                      Versus
                                    State of U.P. and Another
                                                                                               .....Opposite Party(s)

                                    Counsel for Applicant(s)          :   Ramanand Tiwari, Shiv Sharan Tripathi
                                    Counsel for Opposite Party(s)     :   Abhishek Mishra, G.A.

                                    Court No. - 71
                                                       HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J.

                                    1. After some arguments, Learned counsel for the applicant prays that he
                                    may be permitted to approach the concerned Court for seeking regular
                                    bail. He further prays that for a short time, the interest of the applicant
                                    may be protected.

                                    2. The Learned AGA and Shri Abhishek Mishra, Learned counsel for the
                                    informant have no objection to the said prayer.

                                    3. Taking into account the submissions made by the Learned counsel for
                                    the parties, it is directed that in case the applicant appears before the
                                    Court concerned within a period of four weeks from today and applies for
                                    bail in Case Crime No.204 of 2026, under Sections 191(2), 191(3),
                                    115(2), 352, 351(3), 333, 109(1) B.N.S., Police Station Iglas, District
                                    Aligarh, his application for bail shall be considered and disposed of
                                    expeditiously, in accordance with the law, without being influenced by
                                    any observations made by the concerned Court while rejecting the
                                    anticipatory bail application of the applicant.

                                    4. For a period of four weeks from today, no coercive action shall be
                                    taken against the applicant in the aforesaid case.

                                    5. With the aforesaid observations/directions, this application stands
                                    disposed of.



                                                                                      (Rajiv Lochan Shukla,J.)
                                    October 1, 2026/A. Pandey



Digitally signed by :-
ANAND PANDEY
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.