Allahabad High Court
ALEEM SHAMSI ALIAS PAPPU ALIAS ALIM UDDINversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
- Decided
- Bench
- RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA
Holding
The court held that the applicant shall be protected from coercive action for four weeks and may apply for regular bail within that period, with the bail application to be considered without prejudice from the earlier anticipatory bail rejection.
Summary
The applicant, Aleem Shamsi, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The counsel requested that the applicant be allowed to approach the concerned court for regular bail and be protected from any coercive action for a short period. The opposing counsel raised no objection. The court directed that the applicant must appear before the concerned court within four weeks to apply for regular bail under various CrPC sections and that his bail application be considered independently of the earlier anticipatory bail rejection. It also ordered that no coercive action be taken against him for the next four weeks. The anticipatory bail application was consequently disposed of.
Issues considered
- Whether the applicant is entitled to anticipatory bail under Section 482 CrPC
- Whether the applicant can be protected from coercive action for a period of four weeks pending a regular bail application
Legislation cited
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 115(2), 191(2), 310(2), 317(3), 324(4), 333, 351(3), 352, 482, 61(2)
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- Section 482 CrPC
- regular bail
- coercive action
- Allahabad High Court
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No.
- 10299 of 2026
Aleem Shamsi Alias Pappu Alias Alim Uddin
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State of U.P. and Another
.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rakesh Pati Tiwari
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 71
HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J.
1. After some arguments, Learned counsel for the applicant prays that he
may be permitted to approach the concerned Court for seeking regular
bail. He further prays that for a short time, the interest of the applicant
may be protected.
2. The Learned AGA has no objection to the said prayer.
3. Taking into account the submissions made by the Learned counsel for
the parties, it is directed that in case the applicant appears before the
Court concerned within a period of four weeks from today and applies for
bail in Case Crime No.292 of 2026, under Sections 61(2), 191(2), 333,
324(4), 115(2), 352, 351(3), 310(2), 317 (3) B.N.S., Police Station Prem
Nagar, District Bareilly, his application for bail shall be considered and
disposed of expeditiously, in accordance with the law, without being
influenced by any observations made by the concerned Court while
rejecting the anticipatory bail application of the applicant.
4. For a period of four weeks from today, no coercive action shall be
taken against the applicant in the aforesaid case.
5. With the aforesaid observations/directions, this application stands
disposed of.
(Rajiv Lochan Shukla,J.)
October 1, 2026
A. Pandey
Digitally signed by :-
ANAND PANDEY
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…