Allahabad High Court
VIJAY @ VIJAY KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
- Decided
- Bench
- RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA
Holding
The anticipatory bail application was dismissed as infructuous because the applicant had already been arrested.
Summary
Vijay Kumar was arrested by the police. He filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Counsel for the applicant informed the court that the applicant had already been arrested, rendering the anticipatory bail application infructuous. The court, after noting the counsel's submission, dismissed the application as infructuous. No further orders were made.
Legislation cited
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- section 482
- CrPC
- infructuous application
- arrest
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No.
- 5788 of 2026
Vijay @ Vijay Kumar
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State of U.P. and Another
.....Opposite
Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Shravana Kumar Yadav
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 71
HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J.
1. Sri Shravana Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the applicant states
that applicant has been arrested and this application has become
infructuous.
2. Accordingly, present application stands dismissed as infructuous.
(Rajiv Lochan Shukla,J.)
September 23, 2026
S.A.
Digitally signed by :-
SALMAN AHMAD
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…