Allahabad High Court
DHEERAJ CHAMAARversusSTATE OF UP
- Decided
- Bench
- RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA
Holding
The application was dismissed as withdrawn, permitting the applicant to file a fresh application with the required disclosure.
Summary
The applicant, Dheeraj Chamaar, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC. The Attorney General objected, stating that the application failed to disclose the applicant’s criminal antecedents as mandated by Chapter XVIII, Rule 18(7) of the Court Rules. Counsel for the applicant sought permission to withdraw the present application and file a fresh one with the required disclosure. The Court, considering this request, allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the application with liberty to re‑file. Certified copies of the order were directed to be returned to the applicant’s counsel.
Issues considered
- Whether the anticipatory bail application should be dismissed for non‑compliance with Rule 18(7) requiring disclosure of criminal antecedents.
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- Section 482 CrPC
- court rules
- withdrawal of application
- criminal antecedents
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No.
- 9073 of 2026
Dheeraj Chamaar
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State of U.P.
.....Opposite
Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ripusudan Dubey, Savita Dubey
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 71
HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J.
1. At the very outset, the Learned A.G.A. raised an objection by
submitting that in this application, the applicant has not explained his
criminal antecedents as required under the provisions of Chapter XVIII,
Rule 18 sub-Rule (7) of the Rules of the Court.
2. On being confronted with this objection, the Learned counsel for the
applicant submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this application
with liberty to file a fresh application explaining the criminal antecedents
of the applicant in view of the provisions of Chapter XVIII, Rule 18 sub-
Rule (7) of the Rules of the Court.
3. Taking into account the prayer made by the Learned counsel for the
applicant, this application stands dismissed as withdrawn with the above-
mentioned liberty.
4. Certified copies may be returned to the Learned counsel for the
applicant.
(Rajiv Lochan Shukla,J.)
September 11, 2026
Sartaj
Digitally signed by :-
SARTAJ AHMAD
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…