Allahabad High Court
ANUJ KUMAR SINGH YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
- Decided
- Bench
- RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA
Holding
The court disposed of the anticipatory bail application, permitting its withdrawal and directing that no coercive action be taken for four weeks while the applicant seeks regular bail.
Summary
The applicant filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. After hearing, the applicant’s counsel requested to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and instead move a regular bail application in the pending criminal case. The opposing party’s counsel did not object. The court allowed the withdrawal, directing that the applicant appear before the concerned court within four weeks to file a regular bail application and that no coercive action be taken against him during that period. The court ordered that the regular bail application be considered expeditiously and that the anticipatory bail application be dismissed. The application was consequently disposed of.
Issues considered
- Whether an anticipatory bail application can be withdrawn and the applicant can be permitted to seek regular bail in the pending case
- Whether the court can impose a condition of no coercive action for a specified period pending regular bail
Legislation cited
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 316(3), 318(4), 319(2), 336(3), 338, 340(2), 482
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- regular bail
- withdrawal of bail application
- no coercive action
- CrPC Section 482
- Allahabad High Court
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No.
- 9264 of 2026
Anuj Kumar Singh Yadav
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State of U.P. and Another
.....Opposite
Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Suresh Dhar Dwivedi
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 71
HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J.
1. After some arguments, the Learned counsel for the applicant prays that
he may be permitted to withdraw this application with liberty to move a
regular bail application before the concerned Court and till such time, his
interest may be protected.
2. The Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the said prayer.
3. Taking into account the submissions made by the Learned counsels for
the parties, it is provided that in case the applicant appears before the
concerned Court within a period of four weeks from today and applies for
regular bail in Case Crime No.252 of 2026, under Sections 316(3),
318(4), 319(2), 336(3), 338, 340(2) BNS, Police Station Kalan, District
Shahjahanpur, his application for bail may be considered expeditiously, in
accordance with the law, without being influenced by any observations
made by the concerned Court, while rejecting the anticipatory bail
application of the applicant.
4. For a period of four weeks from today, no coercive action shall be
taken against the applicant pursuant to the above-mentioned case.
5. The application stands disposed of.
(Rajiv Lochan Shukla,J.)
September 23, 2026
S.A.
Digitally signed by :-
SALMAN AHMAD
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…