Allahabad High Court
YAMEENversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
- Decided
- Bench
- RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA
Holding
The anticipatory bail application was dismissed as infructuous.
Summary
The applicant Yameen was arrested and filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Counsel for the applicant informed the court that the application had become infructuous. The court considered whether the anticipatory bail application could still be entertained after the applicant’s arrest. Finding that the application was no longer viable, the court dismissed it as infructuous. No further relief was granted to the applicant.
Issues considered
- Whether an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 can be entertained after the applicant has been arrested and the application is deemed infructuous.
Legislation cited
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- Section 482
- Criminal Procedure Code
- infructuous application
- arrest
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No.
- 9735 of 2026
Yameen
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State of U.P. and Another
.....Opposite
Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Farid Ahmad
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 71
HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J.
1. Sri Farid Ahmad, Learned counsel for the applicant, states that the
applicant has been arrested and this application has become infructuous.
2. Dismissed as infructuous.
(Rajiv Lochan Shukla,J.)
September 18, 2026
A. Pandey
Digitally signed by :-
ANAND PANDEY
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…