Allahabad High Court
ASHISH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.
- Decided
- Bench
- RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA
Holding
The court granted anticipatory bail to the applicant.
Summary
Ashish Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under CrPC s.482 in a case (Crime No.114 of 2025) where he is alleged, along with five others, to have assaulted three persons, causing various injuries. The applicant claims he is innocent, that the allegations against him are vague, and that he has no prior criminal record. He points out that similarly situated co‑accused Vipin and Vijay have already been granted anticipatory bail by the same court. The State opposed the bail but did not dispute the factual submissions. Considering the facts, the similarity to the earlier bail orders, and the pending investigation, the court granted anticipatory bail without expressing an opinion on the merits, imposing standard conditions for release.
Issues considered
- Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to Ashish Kumar under CrPC s.482 given the allegations and pending investigation
Legislation cited
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482
- Indian Penal Code — s. 109, 115, 125, 3, 333, 351, 352
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- CrPC 482
- false implication
- pending investigation
- bail conditions
- Uttar Pradesh
- criminal law
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No.
- 9833 of 2026
Ashish Kumar
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State of U.P.
.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rachana Yadav, Ramanuj Yadav
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 71
HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J.
1. Heard, Learned counsel for the applicant, the Learned A.G.A. for the State and
perused the record.
2. The present anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant in
Case Crime No.114 of 2025, under Sections 109(1), 333, 115(2), 352, 351(2), 351(3),
125, 3(5) BNS, P.S.- Rura, District- Kanpur Dehat, with a prayer to enlarge him on
anticipatory bail as the applicant apprehends his arrest in the above-mentioned case.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is absolutely innocent
and has been falsely implicated in the present case. He has nothing to do with the
alleged offence in spite of that the police are trying to arrest the applicant. As per the
contents of the first information report, the applicant along with five others are alleged
to have assaulted three persons namely; Rakesh, Maya and Shiv Shankar. As per the
medical report of Rakesh, he received a single injury on his head. As per the NCCT
head, fracture was seen on skull region. Injured Maya received fracture of radius ulna
bone and the injuries received by injured Shiv Shankar were found simple in nature. In
the statement of injured Rakesh, the co-accused Vishram and Durgesh are alleged to
have assaulted him by lathi-danda. The author of the single injury caused on the head
of Rakesh is not known at this stage. Injury received by Maya was not on vital part of
the body. Further, in the alleged incident from the side of the applicant three persons
also received injuries. In view of the injuries sustained by the persons from the side of
the applicant, there is no clarity with regard to the exact role of the applicant. Vague
and general allegations have been levelled against the applicant. The applicant has no
NABAIL No. 9833 of 2026
2
criminal antecedents. It is next submitted that the investigation is pending and the
applicant has apprehension of his arrest in the above mentioned case. It is further
submitted that identically situated co-accused Vipin and Vijay have been granted
anticipatory bail by this Court in CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL
APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 4939 of 2025 and 9940 of 2026. Learned
counsel for the applicant further submits that the applicant undertakes to cooperate
during investigation and trial and shall appear as and when required by the
Investigating Agency or the Court concerned. It has also been stated that, in case the
applicant is granted anticipatory bail, he shall not misuse the liberty of bail, shall
cooperate with the investigation, and shall abide by all the conditions that may be
imposed by the Court.
4. The Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail but could
not dispute the factual submissions made by the Learned counsel for the applicant.
5. I have considered the submissions made by the Learned counsel for the parties and
perused the material brought on the record.
6. Taking into account all the facts and circumstances of the case, especially the fact
that similarly situated co-accused Vipin and Vijay have already been granted
anticipatory bail by this Court in CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL
APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 4939 of 2025 and 9940 of 2026 and without
expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it fit to enlarge the applicant
on anticipatory bail.
7. In view of the above, the anticipatory bail application of the applicant is allowed.
8. In the event of the arrest of the applicant Ashish Kumar, he shall be released
forthwith in the aforesaid case crime on anticipatory bail on furnishing a personal
bond and surety each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Station House
Officer of the police station/Court concerned with the following conditions:-
i. the applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and
when required;
ii. that the applicant shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or
promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from
disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;
NABAIL No. 9833 of 2026
3
iii. that the applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the
Court;
iv. that the applicant shall not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witness;
9. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the Court concerned shall be at
liberty to cancel the bail.
10. It is made clear that observations made hereinabove are exclusively for deciding
the instant anticipatory bail application and are not to be considered to be an opinion
on the merits of the case.
September 29, 2026
Sachin
(Rajiv Lochan Shukla,J.)
Digitally signed by :-
SACHIN TIWARI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…