Allahabad High Court
HAFIZ ULLAHversusABDUL RASHID
- Decided
- Bench
- PIYUSH AGRAWAL
Holding
The appeal is disposed of because the parties have entered into a court‑verified compromise.
Summary
In Second Appeal No. 570 of 1994 before the Allahabad High Court, appellant Hafiz Ullah challenged a decree against him. The parties subsequently entered into a compromise, which was verified by the trial court and a report was filed on 19 January 2026. The appellant's counsel submitted the compromise report, and the respondent's counsel raised no objection. The court, noting the parties' settlement, held that there was no longer any dispute to be adjudicated. Consequently, the appeal was disposed of on the basis of the compromise.
Issues considered
- What is the effect of a court‑verified compromise on a pending second appeal?
Subjects
- compromise
- second appeal
- civil procedure
- settlement
- appeal disposal
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
SECOND APPEAL No. - 570 of 1994
Hafiz Ullah
.....Appellant(s)
Versus
Abdul Rashid
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Appellant(s) : M.K. Sharma, Manoj Kumar Sharma,
Namit Kumar Sharma
Counsel for Respondent(s) : Rajesh Kumar Yadav, Rituvendra
Singh Nagvanshi, Shiv Karan, Y.S.
Bohra
Court No. - 7
HON'BLE PIYUSH AGRAWAL, J.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that a compromise has been
entered into in between the parties and the same has been verified by the
court below, a report in this regard has been submitted on 19.1.2026.
To the said submission, learned counsel for the respondent has no
objection.
In view of the compromise having been entered into between the parties,
this appeal stands disposed of.
(Piyush Agrawal,J.)
May 7, 2026
samz
Digitally signed by :-
SYED AKHTARMOHAMMAD MEQDAD
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…