Allahabad High Court
SRI KRISHNA AND ANOTHERversusBAJRANG AND ORS.
- Decided
- Disposal
- Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)
- Bench
- PRASHANT KUMAR
Holding
The court held that substitution of the deceased respondent is permissible and allowed the application.
Summary
The respondents filed an application seeking substitution of respondent No.9 who had died. The petitioners did not raise any objection to the substitution. The court examined the application and, finding no opposition, allowed the substitution. It directed that the necessary substitution be effected within a week and listed the matter for further hearing on January 9, 2026. The order was signed by the presiding judge.
Issues considered
- Whether a deceased party may be substituted in the proceedings under the applicable procedural law
Subjects
- substitution
- death of party
- civil procedure
- high court
- application
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
SECOND APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 128 of 2019
Sri Krishna And Another
.....Appellant(s)
Versus
Bajrang And Ors.
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Appellant(s) : Syed Ahmad Jamal
Counsel for Respondent(s) : Haushila Prasad
Court No. - 19
HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J.
C.M. Application No.IA/8/2023.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. This is an application for substitution on account of death of respondent
no.9.
3. There is no objection by the other side.
4. On due consideration, the application is allowed.
5. Let the necessary substitution be incorporated within a week.
6. List this case on January 9, 2026.
(Prashant Kumar,J.)
November 25, 2025
Anupam S/-
Digitally signed by :-
ANUPAM SINGH PATEL
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad,
Lucknow Bench
Checking your session…