Allahabad High Court
MAHENDRA KUMAR MISHRAversusSMT CHANDRA LEKHA AND 6 OTHERS
- Decided
- Bench
- PIYUSH AGRAWAL
Holding
The appeal is dismissed due to non-appearance of the parties.
Summary
Mahendra Kumar Mishra filed a second appeal (Defective No. 84 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court against Smt Chandra Lekha and six others. The appeal was listed under Chapter XII, Rule 4 of the Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952. Counsel for the appellant, Arvind Srivastava, appeared, but no counsel or party appeared for the respondents. The court noted that no steps could be taken in pursuance of the earlier order due to the lack of appearance. Consequently, the court dismissed the appeal for procedural default.
Issues considered
- Whether the appeal can proceed in the absence of any appearance by the parties or their counsel.
Subjects
- appeal
- procedural default
- non-appearance
- dismissal
- Allahabad High Court
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
SECOND APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 84 of 2025
Mahendra Kumar Mishra
.....Appellant(s)
Versus
Smt Chandra Lekha And 6 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Appellant(s) : Arvind Srivastava
Counsel for Respondent(s) :
Court No. - 7
HON'BLE PIYUSH AGRAWAL, J.
The appeal is listed under Chapter XII, Rule 4 of Allahabad High Court
Rules, 1952.
In view of office report,
Case is called. Neither anybody appears on behalf of the appellant nor the
steps could be taken in pursuance of the earlier order.
In view of above, the appeal is dismissed .
(Piyush Agrawal,J.)
September 18, 2026
Rahul Dwivedi/-
Digitally signed by :-
RAHUL DWIVEDI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…