Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

M/S NIKKI ENT UDYOG THRU ITS PROP. RAHUL GOYALversusTHE COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAX U.P. LUCKNOW

Decided

Holding

The revision petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

M/s Nikki Ent Udyog, represented by Rahul Goyal, filed a Sales/Trade Tax Revision (No. 334 of 2017) against the Commissioner of Commercial Tax, U.P., Lucknow. No parties appeared before the court to prosecute the revision. Consequently, the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad dismissed the revision for want of prosecution and vacated any interim order that may have been in force. The dismissal was pronounced by Hon’ble Justice Piyush Agrawal on 17 September 2026. No substantive merits of the tax dispute were addressed.

Subjects

  • revision
  • commercial tax
  • procedural dismissal
  • want of prosecution
  • Allahabad High Court

Judgment

                                                  HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                     SALES/TRADE TAX REVISION No. - 334 of 2017

                                    M/S Nikki Ent Udyog Thru Its Prop. Rahul Goyal
                                                                                                 .....Revisionist(s)
                                                                        Versus

                                    The Commissioner Of Commercial Tax U.P.
                                    Lucknow                                                           .....Opposite
                                                                                                            Party(s)

                                    Counsel for Revisionist(s)                   :   Vinod Kumar Agarwal
                                    Counsel for Opposite Party(s)                :   C.S.C.

                                    Court No. - 7
                                                         HON'BLE PIYUSH AGRAWAL, J.

                                    List has been revised. No one appears for the parties to press this revision.

                                    The revision is of the year 2017.

                                    The present revision is dismissed for want of prosecution.

                                    Interim order, if any, stands vacated.



                                                                                             (Piyush Agrawal,J.)
                                    September 17, 2026
                                    A.N. Mishra




Digitally signed by :-
AMARNATH MISHRA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.