Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

M/S LIVGUARD MOBILE ACCESSORIES PVT. LTD.versusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The revision petition is dismissed for want of prosecution, and the interim order is vacated.

Summary

M/S Livguard Mobile Accessories Pvt. Ltd. filed a revision petition (No. 44 of 2026) challenging an order of the State of Uttar Pradesh and three other parties in a sales/trade tax matter. The petition was listed before the Hon'ble Justice Piyush Agrawal in Court No. 7. No counsel or party appeared on the scheduled date to press the revision. The court dismissed the revision on the ground of want of prosecution, noting that the petition was effectively abandoned. Consequently, any interim order that had been granted earlier was vacated. The dismissal was recorded on May 7, 2026.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate course of action when a revision petition is not pursued by the petitioner?
  • Whether the interim order, if any, should continue to operate after dismissal of the revision?

Subjects

  • sales tax
  • revision
  • procedural default
  • interim order vacated

Judgment

                                                  HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                      SALES/TRADE TAX REVISION No. - 44 of 2026

                                    M/S Livguard Mobile Accessories Pvt. Ltd.
                                                                                             .....Revisionist(s)
                                                                        Versus

                                    State Of Uttar Pradesh And 3 Others
                                                                                                  .....Opposite
                                                                                                        Party(s)

                                    Counsel for Revisionist(s)                       :   Ranjay Kumar
                                    Counsel for Opposite Party(s)                    :   C.S.C.

                                    Court No. - 7
                                                         HON'BLE PIYUSH AGRAWAL, J.

                                    List has been revised. No one appears for the revisionist(s) to press this
                                    revision.

                                    The revision is dismissed for want of prosecution.

                                    Interim order, if any, stands vacated.



                                                                                          (Piyush Agrawal,J.)
                                    May 7, 2026
                                    Rahul Dwivedi/-




Digitally signed by :-
RAHUL DWIVEDI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.