Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

M/S UTTAM MODERN RICE AND OIL MILLSversusCOMMISSIONER OF TRADE/COMMERCIAL TAX

Decided

Holding

The revision petition was dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

M/s Uttam Modern Rice and Oil Mills filed a revision petition (Sales/Trade Tax Revision No. 62 of 2018) against the Commissioner of Trade/Commercial Tax. The petition was presented before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. Counsel for the revisionist, Krishna Agarawal, informed the court that he had no instruction to appear in the matter. Accordingly, the court dismissed the revision for want of prosecution. The interim order, if any, was vacated.

Subjects

  • sales tax
  • trade tax
  • revision
  • procedural dismissal

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

                                                SALES/TRADE TAX REVISION No. - 62 of 2018

                                    M/S Uttam Modern Rice And Oil Mills
                                                                                                .....Revisionist(s)
                                                                        Versus
                                    Commissioner Of Trade/Commercial Tax
                                                                                                     .....Opposite
                                                                                                           Party(s)

                                    Counsel for Revisionist(s)                    :    Krishna Agarawal
                                    Counsel for Opposite Party(s)                 :    C.S.C.

                                    Court No. - 7
                                                        HON'BLE PIYUSH AGRAWAL, J.

                                    1. Learned counsel for the revisionist submits that he has no instruction in
                                    the matter.

                                    2. Accordingly, the present revision is dismissed for want of prosecution.

                                    3. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.

                                    September 29, 2026
                                    Ajeet
                                                                                            (Piyush Agrawal,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
AJEET KUMAR PATEL
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.