Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

RAJVEERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner, Rajveer, filed a public interest litigation (PIL) before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, the petitioner's counsel, Sunil Kumar Singh, prayed for withdrawal of the writ petition. The counsel for respondent No.5 and the Standing Counsel for the State-Respondents raised no objection to the withdrawal. The Court accepted the prayer and dismissed the petition as withdrawn. The matter was ordered to be detagged and listed later before the appropriate Bench.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition filed as a public interest litigation can be withdrawn by the petitioner

Subjects

  • Public Interest Litigation
  • Writ Petition
  • Withdrawal
  • Dismissal
  • High Court

Judgment

                                                  HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                  PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 2112 of 2025

                                    Rajveer
                                                                                                      .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                         Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 6 Others
                                                                                                    .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)               :     Sunil Kumar Singh
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)               :     C.S.C., Sher Bahadur Singh

                                    Court No. - 38
                                                             HON'BLE VIVEK SARAN, J.

                                    1. After some length of arguments, Sri Sunil Kumar Singh, learned counsel
                                    for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the writ petition.

                                    2. Learned counsel for the respondent no.5 and learned Standing Counsel for
                                    the State-Respondents do not have any objection to the above prayer.


                                    3. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

                                    4. Let connected matter be detagged and listed in due course before the
                                    appropriate Bench.



                                                                                                    (Vivek Saran,J.)
                                    April 29, 2026
                                    Gaurav Kuls




Digitally signed by :-
GAURAV KULSHRESTHA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.