Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

MUKESHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty granted to the petitioner to file a fresh petition.

Summary

Petitioner Mukesh filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of U.P. and others. During the hearing, the petitioner, through counsel, requested that the petition be dismissed as withdrawn and sought liberty to file a fresh petition with more detailed particulars. The respondent did not oppose this request. The Court, after considering the petitioner's prayer, allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the writ petition accordingly. No substantive merits of the original petition were adjudicated.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate procedure for withdrawing a writ petition before the High Court?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • dismissal
  • procedural law
  • High Court

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                            WRIT - A No. - 14151 of 2026

                                    Mukesh
                                                                                               .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                      Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 2 Others
                                                                                             .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)      : Birendra Pratap Yadav, Krishna Kant
                                                                     Yadav
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)      : C.S.C., Shyam Mani Shukla

                                    Court No. - 32
                                                        HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J.

                                    1. Learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Ravi Anand Agarwal,
                                    learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.2 are present.

                                    2. After due deliberations at length, learned counsel for the petitioner
                                    prays for to dismiss the instant writ petition as withdrawn with liberty to
                                    file a fresh petition with better particulars and details of the case.

                                    3. There is no oppose to the aforesaid prayer.

                                    4. As such, instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty,
                                    as prayed for.



                                                                                           (Dinesh Pathak,J.)
                                    September 9, 2026
                                    VR




Digitally signed by :-
VIBHA RATAN
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.