Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

HARIOM SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner, Hariom Sharma, filed Writ Petition No. 14846 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and three other respondents. During the proceedings, the petitioner, through counsel Prabhat Chandra Mishra, informed the Court that he no longer wished to pursue the petition. The respondent counsel, Ashok Kumar Lal, did not oppose this request. The Court considered the petitioner's intention to withdraw the writ petition. Accordingly, the Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn. The order was pronounced on 30 September 2026 by Justice Dinesh Pathak.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition can be dismissed as withdrawn upon the petitioner's request

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • dismissal
  • high court

Judgment

                                                 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

                                                                WRIT - A No. - 14846 of 2026

                                    Hariom Sharma
                                                                                                         .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                          Versus
                                    State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                                       .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                      :   Prabhat Chandra Mishra
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                      :   C.S.C., Rashtrapati Khare

                                    Court No. - 32
                                                           HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J.

                                    1. Sri Akash Diwvedi (Enrollment No. UP16474/23), learned Advocate,
                                    holding brief of Sri Prabhat Chandra Mishra, learned counsel for the
                                    petitioner submits that the petitioner does not wish to press the instant writ
                                    petition and, therefore, the same may be dismissed as withdrawn.

                                    2. Sri Ashok Kumar Lal, learned Standing Counsel appearing for
                                    respondent Nos. 1 to 3, has no objection to the submission advanced by
                                    learned counsel for the petitioner.

                                    3. As such, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

                                    September 30, 2026
                                    vkg
                                                                                                    (Dinesh Pathak,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
VINOD KUMAR GOSWAMI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.