Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

RAJENDRA PRASAD VISHWAKARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to file a fresh petition.

Summary

Petitioner Rajendra Prasad Vishwakarma filed a writ petition and later moved the court to withdraw it, seeking liberty to file a fresh petition with better particulars. The respondent State of U.P. and others did not oppose the withdrawal. The court, after noting the petitioner's request and the respondents' lack of objection, dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn, granting the liberty sought. No substantive merits of the original petition were considered. The order was pronounced by Justice Dinesh Pathak on 23 September 2026.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition can be withdrawn and dismissed by the court upon the petitioner's request

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • dismissal
  • high court
  • procedural

Judgment

                                                 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

                                                                WRIT - A No. - 15443 of 2026

                                    Rajendra Prasad Vishwakarma
                                                                                                       .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                          Versus
                                    State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                                     .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                      :   Ram Bilas Prasad
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                      :   C.S.C., Ved Byas Mishra

                                    Court No. - 32
                                                           HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J.

                                    1. Sri R.B. Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner has prayed for to
                                    dismiss the instant writ petition as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh
                                    petition with the better particulars and details of the case.

                                    2. Learned counsel for the respondents has no objection to the prayer as
                                    made by the learned counsel for the petitioner.

                                    3. As such, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty
                                    as prayed for.

                                    September 23, 2026
                                    vkg
                                                                                                   (Dinesh Pathak,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
VINOD KUMAR GOSWAMI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.