Allahabad High Court
RAJ KUMAR SHARMAversusVC. DR. BHEEMRAO AMBEDKAR VISHWAVIDYALAYA AND 2 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed as the cause of action does not survive or the petitioner has lost interest.
Summary
Petitioner Raj Kumar Sharma filed a writ petition (WRIT-A No. 4463 of 2016) against Vc. Dr. Bheemrao Ambedkar Vishwavidyalaya and two other respondents. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition, while the standing counsel for the State-respondent was present. The court observed that the cause of action either no longer existed or the petitioner had lost interest in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the court found that the petition could not proceed. The writ petition was dismissed and any interim order that had been in force was discharged.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner’s cause of action survives for the writ petition to be entertained
- Whether the writ petition can be dismissed for lack of representation by the petitioner
Subjects
- writ petition
- dismissal
- cause of action
- procedural default
- interim order discharged
Judgment
Court No. - 30
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 4463 of 2016
Petitioner :- Raj Kumar Sharma
Respondent :- Vc. Dr. Bheemrao Ambedkar Vishwavidyalaya
And 2 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Vinod Kumar Singh,A.Kumar,Ajay
Kumar Singh,Mool Chandra Maurya
Counsel for Respondent :- Vivek Verma,M.N. Singh,S.C.,M.N.
Hon'ble Rajiv Joshi,J.
List of additional cases has been revised.
No one appears on behalf of the petitioner to press this writ
petition. Learned Standing counsel for the State-respondent is
present.
It appears that either cause of action does not survive or the
petitioner has lost interest in pursuing the matter.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed.
Interim order, if any, stands discharged.
Order Date :- 24.2.2023
Akbar
Digitally signed by :-
MOHAMMAD AKBAR
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…