Allahabad High Court
OM PRAKASH PANDEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 ORS
- Decided
- Bench
- DINESH PATHAK
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
Om Prakash Pandey filed Writ‑A No. 45696 of 2014 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and four other respondents. The petition was listed but no substantive pleadings or documents were filed by the petitioner. The learned Standing Counsel and the respondent’s counsel, Sunil Kumar Mishra, appeared before the bench. Justice Vivek Chaudhary observed that there was no prosecution of the writ petition and consequently dismissed it for want of prosecution. The interim order, if any, was discharged. The order was pronounced on 6 April 2023.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for want of prosecution?
Subjects
- writ petition
- want of prosecution
- dismissal
- civil procedure
- Allahabad High Court
Judgment
Court No. - 32
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 45696 of 2014
Petitioner :- Om Prakash Pandey
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Ors
Counsel for Petitioner :- Yogesh Agarwal,Rajesh Kumar Dubey
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sunil Kumar Mishra
Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J.
Case called out in the revised list.
None appears for the petitioner(s) to press the writ
petition.
Learned Standing Counsel and Sri Sunil Kumar
Mishra, learned counsel for respondent are present.
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands discharged.
.
(Vivek Chaudhary, J.)
Order Date :- 6.4.2023
Arjun/-
Digitally signed by :-
ARJUN PRASAD
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…