Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

RAJU GANGWARversusSTATE OF U.P. THRU PRIN.SECY. HOME LUCKNOW AND ORS.

Decided
Disposal
Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits/Granted

Holding

A petition is dismissed for want of prosecution when the petitioner fails to appear and makes no request for adjournment.

Summary

The petitioner, Raju Gangwar, filed Writ Petition No. 4845 of 2019 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. The petition was listed for hearing, but the petitioner’s counsel, Kapil Gupta, failed to appear and made no request for an adjournment. The respondent's counsel, C.S.C., was present and ready to argue. The Court observed that the petitioner had not prosecuted the petition and, in accordance with procedural rules, could not allow the matter to proceed. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution and vacated any interim order that might have been in force. The order was pronounced by Justice Dinesh Kumar Singh on 26 May 2023.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate course of action when a petitioner fails to appear for a scheduled hearing without seeking an adjournment?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • procedural law
  • dismissal for want of prosecution
  • non-appearance
  • interim order vacated

Judgment

                                                                                 Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC-LKO:37915




                                         Court No. - 8

                                         Case :- WRIT - A No. - 4845 of 2019

                                         Petitioner :- Raju Gangwar
                                         Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy. Home Lucknow And Ors.
                                         Counsel for Petitioner :- Kapil Gupta
                                         Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

                                         Hon'ble Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.

                                         1. List has been revised.

                                         2. Neither counsel for the petitioner(s) has put in appearance to prosecute
                                         this petition, nor any request has been made for passing over/adjourning
                                         the case, though learned State Counsel is present for respondents.

                                         3. Thus, this petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim order,
                                         if any, stands vacated.

                                                                                                   [D.K. SINGH, J.]

                                         Order Date :- 26.5.2023
                                         MVS/-




Digitally signed by :-
MANOJ VIKRAM SINGH CHAUHAN
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad,
Lucknow Bench


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.