Allahabad High Court
SATISH CHANDRA MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
- Decided
- Bench
- PRAKASH PADIA
Holding
The Court grants a further three weeks to the petitioner to obtain fresh instructions.
Summary
Satish Chandra Mishra filed a writ petition against the State of Uttar Pradesh and two others. The petitioner’s standing counsel submitted instructions dated 04.05.2026 from the Chief Treasury Officer, Ghaziabad, but argued that these were insufficient to resolve the controversy. The Court granted the petitioner an additional three weeks to obtain fresh instructions. The matter was listed again on 10.07.2026 before the appropriate bench. No substantive merits of the petition were decided in this order.
Subjects
- procedural order
- time extension
- writ petition
- standing counsel
- fresh instructions
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - A No. - 5305 of 2026
Satish Chandra Mishra
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 2 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ratnesh Kumar Pandey
Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C.
Court No. - 6
HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J.
1. Learned Standing Counsel placed Instructions dated 04.05.2026
received under the signatures of Chief Treasury Officer,
Ghaziabad/respondent No.2, the same is taken on record.
2. It is argued by learned Standing Counsel that the aforesaid Instructions
are not so enough to resolve the controversy involved in the petition and
prays to grant some time to seek fresh Instructions.
3.In this view of the matter, three weeks further time is granted to seek
fresh Instructions.
4. Put up as fresh on 10.07.2026 before appropriate Bench.
(Prakash Padia,J.)
May 15, 2026
saqlain
Digitally signed by :-
SYED MOHAMMAD SAQLAIN HAIDER
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…