Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

JYOTI SINGHversusState of UP AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petition is dismissed as withdrawn since it became infructuous.

Summary

The petitioner Jyoti Singh filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 5506 of 2024) seeking to quash an advertisement and to have a representation dated 09‑02‑2023 decided. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel informed the court that the representation had already been decided by the respondents, rendering the petition infructuous. No opposition was raised by the respondents. The court accepted the petitioner's request to withdraw the petition and dismissed it, granting liberty to file a fresh petition if desired. The matter was disposed of as a withdrawn petition.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition should be dismissed as infructuous because the representation sought to be decided had already been resolved by the respondents

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • quash
  • representation
  • withdrawn petition
  • infructuous
  • High Court of Allahabad

Judgment

                                            HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                          WRIT - A No. - 5506 of 2024

                                  Jyoti Singh
                                                                                             .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                    Versus

                                  State Of Up And 3 Others
                                                                                           .....Respondent(s)

                                  Counsel for Petitioner(s)      : Mahesh Pandey, Manoj Kumar Verma,
                                                                   Santosh Kumar Pandey
                                  Counsel for Respondent(s)      : C.S.C.

                                  Court No. - 6
                                                      HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J.

                                  1. The present petition has been filed with the prayer to quash the
                                  advertisement and to decide the representation dated 09.02.2023.

                                  2. Today when the matter is taken up, it is informed by Sri Manoj Kumar
                                  Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner that since the aforesaid
                                  representation has already been decided by the respondents, therefore,
                                  present petition became infructuous and prays to dismiss the present
                                  petition as having become infructuous with liberty to file fresh petition
                                  challenging the order passed in representation.

                                  3. This prayer has not been opposed by learned counsel for the
                                  respondents.

                                  4. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty
                                  as prayed.




                                                                                         (Prakash Padia,J.)
                                  May 5, 2026
                                  saqlain




Digitally signed by :-
SYED MOHAMMAD SAQLAIN HAIDER
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.