Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

PADMAKAR PANDEYversusSTATE OF U.P.AND 4 ORS.

Decided
Disposal
Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

Holding

The writ petition was dismissed as abated because the petitioner had died and no heirs or legal representatives were filed.

Summary

Petitioner Padmakar Pandey filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared for the petitioner. The respondent produced a copy of instructions indicating that the petitioner had died on 27 June 2023 and his wife on 6 April 2023. The court noted that no heirs or legal representatives of the deceased petitioner had been brought on record. In the absence of a representative, the court held that the petition could not proceed. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed as abated.

Issues considered

  • The petition can continue despite the death of the petitioner without a legal representative.

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • abated petition
  • death of petitioner
  • legal representative
  • high court

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                            WRIT - A No. - 64331 of 2013

                                    Padmakar Pandey
                                                                                                    .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                       Versus

                                    State Of U.P.And 4 Ors.
                                                                                               .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)       : R.P.S.Chauhan
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)       : C.S.C., Manoj Srivastava, Nishant
                                                                      Mehrotra, Sachindra Upadhyay

                                    Court No. - 33
                                                        HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J.

                                    1. List revised. None is present on behalf of the petitioner.

                                    2. Learned counsel for the respondent no.2 has produced copy of
                                    instructions received from his office, today in the Court, which is taken on
                                    record. Office is directed to proceed accordingly. He, based on the
                                    instructions, submits that the petitioner died on 27.06.2023 and his wife
                                    died on 06.04.2023. Till date, no steps have been taken to bring on record
                                    the heirs and legal representatives of the sole petitioner.

                                    3. In view of the above, instant writ petition is dismissed as abated.



                                                                                             (Dinesh Pathak,J.)
                                    May 12, 2026
                                    VR




Digitally signed by :-
VIBHA RATAN
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.