Allahabad High Court
RAMESH CHANDRA AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 2 OTHERS
- Decided
- Bench
- PRAKASH PADIA
Holding
The petition is dismissed as not pressed, with liberty to file a fresh petition.
Summary
The petitioners sought relief through a writ petition, but the court found that the petition was not pressed. The petitioners were given liberty to file a fresh petition with better averments. Consequently, the court dismissed the present petition as not pressed. No substantive factual or legal issues were addressed beyond the procedural dismissal. The order was pronounced by Justice Prakash Padia on May 6, 2026.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition is pressed for adjudication
Subjects
- petition dismissed
- not pressed
- writ petition
- procedural dismissal
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - A No. - 6712 of 2026
Ramesh Chandra And 5 Others
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Himanshu Goswami, Saurabh Sharma
Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C.
Court No. - 6
HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J.
1. After some arguments, a prayer has been made by the counsel for the
petitioner to dismiss the present petition as not pressed with liberty to the
petitioner to file a fresh petition with better averments.
2. Prayer is allowed.
3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty as
prayed.
(Prakash Padia,J.)
May 6, 2026
Swati
Digitally signed by :-
SWATI PATHAK
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…