Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SMT MEENAversusSTATE OF UP AND 2 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The court held that the competent authority must decide the pending compassionate appointment within two months of the certified copy being produced.

Summary

The petitioner, Smt Meena, filed a writ petition seeking direction for her appointment on compassionate grounds, which was pending before the authorities without any decision. The petitioners argued that the delay violated their right to a timely appointment. The court examined the pending status and noted the absence of any decision by the competent authority. It held that the authority must act promptly to avoid undue hardship to the petitioner. Consequently, the court disposed of the petition, directing the Senior Superintendent of Police, Sambhal, to decide the matter within two months of receiving the certified copy.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate judicial remedy when an appointment on compassionate grounds remains pending without decision?

Subjects

  • compassionate appointment
  • service law
  • writ petition
  • administrative delay
  • Allahabad High Court

Judgment

                                            HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                          WRIT - A No. - 6752 of 2026

                                  Smt Meena
                                                                                              .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                    Versus

                                  State Of Up And 2 Others
                                                                                           .....Respondent(s)

                                  Counsel for Petitioner(s)       : Archana Singh, Bramh Narayan Singh
                                  Counsel for Respondent(s)       : C.S.C.

                                  Court No. - 6
                                                      HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J.

                                  1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel
                                  for the respondents.

                                  2. The matter is pertaining to the appointment of the petitioner on
                                  compassionate ground which is still pending before the authorities but till
                                  date no decision has been taken in the matter.

                                  3. In this view of the matter, the present petition is disposed of directing
                                  the respondent No.2/Senior Superintendent of Police, Sambhal/competent
                                  authority take a decision in the matter most expeditiously and preferably
                                  within a period of two months from the date of production of certified
                                  copy before him.



                                                                                          (Prakash Padia,J.)
                                  May 6, 2026
                                  saqlain




Digitally signed by :-
SYED MOHAMMAD SAQLAIN HAIDER
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.