SATYAVEER SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

          HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

                        WRIT - A No. - 6755 of 2026

Satyaveer Sharma
                                                                  .....Petitioner(s)
                                     Versus
State Of U.P. And 2 Others
                                                                .....Respondent(s)

Counsel for Petitioner(s)         : Gaurav Tiwari, Km. Ashra, Tanveer
                                    Zafar Khan
Counsel for Respondent(s)         : C.S.C., Kaushalendra Nath Singh

Court No. - 33
                     HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel
representing State-respondents and perused the record on board.

2. This writ petition has been filed, inter alia, seeking the following relief:

     "I. Issue a writ order nature of direction in the mandamus directing the
     respondent authorities to consider and decide the claim of the petitioner
     dated 21.11.2025 with regard to the payment of salary and re-
     employment within a short stipulated time period as may be specified and
     directed by this Hon'ble Court."

3. It has been submitted that the claim of the petitioner for payment of salary
and reinstatement in the service have not been decided till date, despite the
repeated representation made by the petitioner.

4. Learned counsel for the Noida authority has contended that the grievance
of the present petitioner can be more appropriately redressed by the Chief
Executive Officer (respondent No. 2), and he has no objection, in case, a
direction is issued for expeditious disposal of a fresh representation to be
moved by the petitioner within such stipulated period as may be directed by
this Court.

5. In this conspectus, as above, no useful purpose would be served by
keeping this matter pending, therefore, this Court deems it appropriate to
finally dispose of the present writ petition, without considering the merits of
the case, with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation before
Chief Executive Officer (respondent No. 2), with respect to his grievances,
                                                                                              WRIA No. 6755 of 2026
                                                                    2


                                    as mentioned in the present writ petition, within a period of three weeks
                                    from today along with a certified copy of this order and self attested copy of
                                    the present petition, who shall, either himself or through the authority
                                    competent, as permissible under the law, consider and decide the same in
                                    accordance with law expeditiously, preferably, within a period of three
                                    months thereafter.

                                    6. With the aforesaid observation, present writ petition is disposed of.

                                    May 6, 2026
                                    vinay
                                                                                              (Dinesh Pathak,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
VINAY KUMAR
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad