Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

HARKESH SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The court held that the petitioner may discharge the panel rent in six equal monthly installments without interest, and the recovery order is stayed pending compliance.

Summary

Petitioner Harkesh Singh challenged a recovery order dated 1 December 2025 that required him to pay Rs 81,184 as panel rent and an additional Rs 59,928 as penal rent for the period December 2025 to February 2026. He had vacated the official accommodation on 23 March 2026 and, citing his financial constraints, requested permission to pay the amount in easy installments and sought a waiver of interest. The respondents, represented by the Standing Counsel, raised no objection to the petition. The High Court, after hearing both sides, ordered that the panel rent be paid in six equal monthly installments starting July 2026, with no interest to be charged, and directed that the recovery order remain in abeyance during the installment period. The court warned that any default would allow the respondents to resume recovery proceedings and disposed of the writ petition without any order as to costs.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner may be permitted to pay the panel rent in installments
  • Whether interest on the due amount can be waived
  • Whether the recovery order can be kept in abeyance pending installment payments

Subjects

  • panel rent
  • installment payment
  • interest waiver
  • recovery order
  • writ petition
  • High Court

Judgment

         HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                        WRIT - A No. - 6771 of 2026

Harkesh Singh
                                                            .....Petitioner(s)
                                  Versus

State Of U.P. And 2 Others
                                                         .....Respondent(s)

Counsel for Petitioner(s)              :   Dhananjay Kumar Mishra
Counsel for Respondent(s)              :   C.S.C.

Court No. - 6
                    HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel


2. The order of recovery dated 01.12.2025 passed by the respondent

No.2/Superintendent, District Jail Bijnor (Annexure No.3) is under

challenge. By the aforesaid order, the petitioner was directed to deposit a

sum of Rs.81,184/- as panel rent. till November 2025.


3. It is argued by learned counsel for the petitioner that for the period

December, 2025 to February, 2026, a sum of Rs.59,928/- has also due for

payment as penal rent. It is argued that the petitioner has directed to pay

interest on panel rent till the time he has vacated the accommodation. It is

argued that official accommodation has already been vacated by the

petitioner on 23.03.2026 and due to his financial situation, he could not

deposit the entire amount at once prays that the petitioner be permitted to

deposit in easy installments.


4. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection.


5. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.


6. In the facts and circumstances of the case and without entering into
                                                                                          WRIA No. 6771 of 2026
                                                                 2


                                  merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of directing the

                                  petitioner to deposit the amount of panel rent in six equal installments

                                  month by month started from the month of July, 2026. The respondents

                                  are directed not to charge any interest on the due amount, if the petitioner

                                  is started payment of installments.

                                  7. Till the period prescribed for depositing the aforesaid amount and

                                  thereafter during the period of deposit of installments, the recovery order

                                  will be kept in abeyance. In case the petitioner defaults in depositing the

                                  installments within the stipulated period, it will be open for the

                                  respondents to start recovery proceedings against the petitioner.

                                  8. With the aforesaid observations/directions, the writ petition stands

                                  disposed of. No order as to costs.



                                                                                          (Prakash Padia,J.)
                                  May 6, 2026
                                  saqlain




Digitally signed by :-
SYED MOHAMMAD SAQLAIN HAIDER
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.