Allahabad High Court
RAJAIversusD.D.C. AND OTHERS
- Decided
- Bench
- PRAKASH PADIA
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed in default for the petitioner's non‑appearance.
Summary
The petitioner filed Writ Petition No. 13637 of 1981 in the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner when the matter was listed for hearing. The Court dismissed the petition in default for non-appearance. The interim order previously granted, if any, was vacated. The Court allowed any aggrieved party to file a recall application within one month.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition may be dismissed for default due to the petitioner's failure to appear before the Court
Subjects
- writ petition
- default dismissal
- procedural law
- civil procedure
- court hearing
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - B No. - 13637 of 1981
Rajai
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
D.D.C. And Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : J.P.N.Raj, S.D. Pathak
Counsel for Respondent(s) : N.A.Kajmi, S.C.
Court No. - 6
HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J.
. The matter is listed under heading "Oldest pending cases for priority
hearing".
2. List revised. Nobody is present on behalf of petitioner(s).
3. The writ petition is dismissed in default.
4. Interim order, if any granted earlier, stands vacated.
5. In case, any of the party is aggrieved with this order, he is free to move
the recall application within one month from today.
(Prakash Padia,J.)
January 30, 2026
saqlain
Digitally signed by :-
SYED MOHAMMAD SAQLAIN HAIDER
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…